Review



integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms
    Comparative analysis of <t>2DE</t> proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.
    Integral Original 2de Gel Image Processing Algorithms, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2633 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 2633 article reviews
    integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis"

    Article Title: Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis

    Journal: Biomedicines

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081821

    Comparative analysis of 2DE proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparative analysis of 2DE proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.

    Techniques Used: Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Molecular Weight

    The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from  2DE  gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies fractionated in the pI 3–11 range. An increase in spot intensity yields a positive fold-change and a decrease accordingly a negative fold-change in AFN/AFP (marked as G1/G2). a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from 2DE gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies fractionated in the pI 3–11 range. An increase in spot intensity yields a positive fold-change and a decrease accordingly a negative fold-change in AFN/AFP (marked as G1/G2). a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane

    The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from  2DE  gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in pI 3–11 and pI 4–7 range. a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from 2DE gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in pI 3–11 and pI 4–7 range. a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Membrane

    Comparative analysis of 2DE protein maps corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in different pI range. ( A ) proteins corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP), fractionated in different pI range: pI 3–11 (G2, blue in G2 + G3) and pI 4–7 (G3, orange in G2 + G3) range and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 3–11 are the same as in . Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 4–7 are the same as in . ( B ) Computational analysis of several protein groups is performed to evaluate their distribution in different pI value ranges. It shows that the same protein level with different pI changes because of modification level. In , the proteins’ spot distribution corresponding to the different modification level is presented (column— Share, %). Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparative analysis of 2DE protein maps corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in different pI range. ( A ) proteins corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP), fractionated in different pI range: pI 3–11 (G2, blue in G2 + G3) and pI 4–7 (G3, orange in G2 + G3) range and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 3–11 are the same as in . Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 4–7 are the same as in . ( B ) Computational analysis of several protein groups is performed to evaluate their distribution in different pI value ranges. It shows that the same protein level with different pI changes because of modification level. In , the proteins’ spot distribution corresponding to the different modification level is presented (column— Share, %). Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.

    Techniques Used: Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Modification

    Identified AFP proteins—those expressions are higher in comparison to proteome associated with normal pregnancy in  2DE  gels with pI 3–11 ranges (right panel) and AFP proteins, the spots number of which (proportionate to modification) in AFP pI 4–7 differ in comparison to fractionated in pI 3–11 range (left panel).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Identified AFP proteins—those expressions are higher in comparison to proteome associated with normal pregnancy in 2DE gels with pI 3–11 ranges (right panel) and AFP proteins, the spots number of which (proportionate to modification) in AFP pI 4–7 differ in comparison to fractionated in pI 3–11 range (left panel).

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Modification, Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane



    Similar Products

    96
    MathWorks Inc integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms
    Comparative analysis of <t>2DE</t> proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.
    Integral Original 2de Gel Image Processing Algorithms, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    integral original 2de gel image processing algorithms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc integrated image processing toolbox
    Comparative analysis of <t>2DE</t> proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.
    Integrated Image Processing Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/integrated image processing toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    integrated image processing toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparative analysis of 2DE proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081821

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of 2DE proteome maps characteristic for normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies. The proteins were resolved by 2DE, pH range 3–11, and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. 2DE images of proteins of amniotic fluid of normal pregnancy (AFN, G1; blue in G1 + G2 and amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP, G2; orange in G1 + G2) were superposed and presented in G1 + G2. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels are the same as in . Molecular weight (Mw) markers are presented on the left. Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.

    Article Snippet: The prototype is executed in MatlabTM environment (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and has integral original 2DE gel image processing algorithms as tools for specific tasks: Image preparation tools: image cropping (to remove excess areas), spot labelling, master gel selection (to align the group of gels), molecular mass markers’ calibration (to delineate area of MM marker and input of MM values), pI calibration (to input positions of known pI values); Image preprocessing related tools: image smoothing (to eliminate impulse noise), background elimination (to remove variations of background staining), individual image warping (to straighten protein migration paths); Image segmentation tools: 2DE image splitting (to split image into primary segments), segmented area evaluation (to highlight uncertain segmentations of protein spots for the user), editing of segments (to manually edit protein spots in order to remove false negatives and positives of segmentation by merging, splitting, adding, or removing areas); Image alignment tools: initial registration (to automatically detect some high confident control points for initial image registration), spot pairing and concluding image alignment (to find correspondences between spots), manual editing of alignment vectors (to remove mismatches and add new matches between images); Quantitative analysis tools: spot quantification (to measure normalized quantities of spots), changes evaluation (to calculate change ratios); Visualization tools: 3D viewer (to display small area of image as surface), image fusion (to display overlay of two images using pseudocolors).

    Techniques: Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Molecular Weight

    The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from  2DE  gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies fractionated in the pI 3–11 range. An increase in spot intensity yields a positive fold-change and a decrease accordingly a negative fold-change in AFN/AFP (marked as G1/G2). a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081821

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from 2DE gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of normal and polyhydramnios pregnancies fractionated in the pI 3–11 range. An increase in spot intensity yields a positive fold-change and a decrease accordingly a negative fold-change in AFN/AFP (marked as G1/G2). a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.

    Article Snippet: The prototype is executed in MatlabTM environment (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and has integral original 2DE gel image processing algorithms as tools for specific tasks: Image preparation tools: image cropping (to remove excess areas), spot labelling, master gel selection (to align the group of gels), molecular mass markers’ calibration (to delineate area of MM marker and input of MM values), pI calibration (to input positions of known pI values); Image preprocessing related tools: image smoothing (to eliminate impulse noise), background elimination (to remove variations of background staining), individual image warping (to straighten protein migration paths); Image segmentation tools: 2DE image splitting (to split image into primary segments), segmented area evaluation (to highlight uncertain segmentations of protein spots for the user), editing of segments (to manually edit protein spots in order to remove false negatives and positives of segmentation by merging, splitting, adding, or removing areas); Image alignment tools: initial registration (to automatically detect some high confident control points for initial image registration), spot pairing and concluding image alignment (to find correspondences between spots), manual editing of alignment vectors (to remove mismatches and add new matches between images); Quantitative analysis tools: spot quantification (to measure normalized quantities of spots), changes evaluation (to calculate change ratios); Visualization tools: 3D viewer (to display small area of image as surface), image fusion (to display overlay of two images using pseudocolors).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane

    The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from  2DE  gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in pI 3–11 and pI 4–7 range. a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081821

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The summarized search results (by UniProt, Expasy) of proteins identified from 2DE gels representing protein maps of amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in pI 3–11 and pI 4–7 range. a ) AC—accession number; b ) Score—protein Score C.I. %; c ) Match—Matching (sequence coverage, %); d ) TP—Theoretical Peptides; e ) DP—Digest Peptides; f ) FC—Fold Change.

    Article Snippet: The prototype is executed in MatlabTM environment (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and has integral original 2DE gel image processing algorithms as tools for specific tasks: Image preparation tools: image cropping (to remove excess areas), spot labelling, master gel selection (to align the group of gels), molecular mass markers’ calibration (to delineate area of MM marker and input of MM values), pI calibration (to input positions of known pI values); Image preprocessing related tools: image smoothing (to eliminate impulse noise), background elimination (to remove variations of background staining), individual image warping (to straighten protein migration paths); Image segmentation tools: 2DE image splitting (to split image into primary segments), segmented area evaluation (to highlight uncertain segmentations of protein spots for the user), editing of segments (to manually edit protein spots in order to remove false negatives and positives of segmentation by merging, splitting, adding, or removing areas); Image alignment tools: initial registration (to automatically detect some high confident control points for initial image registration), spot pairing and concluding image alignment (to find correspondences between spots), manual editing of alignment vectors (to remove mismatches and add new matches between images); Quantitative analysis tools: spot quantification (to measure normalized quantities of spots), changes evaluation (to calculate change ratios); Visualization tools: 3D viewer (to display small area of image as surface), image fusion (to display overlay of two images using pseudocolors).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Membrane

    Comparative analysis of 2DE protein maps corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in different pI range. ( A ) proteins corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP), fractionated in different pI range: pI 3–11 (G2, blue in G2 + G3) and pI 4–7 (G3, orange in G2 + G3) range and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 3–11 are the same as in . Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 4–7 are the same as in . ( B ) Computational analysis of several protein groups is performed to evaluate their distribution in different pI value ranges. It shows that the same protein level with different pI changes because of modification level. In , the proteins’ spot distribution corresponding to the different modification level is presented (column— Share, %). Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081821

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of 2DE protein maps corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy fractionated in different pI range. ( A ) proteins corresponding amniotic fluid of polyhydramnios pregnancy (AFP), fractionated in different pI range: pI 3–11 (G2, blue in G2 + G3) and pI 4–7 (G3, orange in G2 + G3) range and Excel Gel SDS, gradient 8–18%. Arrows and numbers in the 2DE maps indicate the positions of proteins supplied to MALDI-TOF MS/MS and identified. Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 3–11 are the same as in . Spot labels for the proteins fractionated in the range pI 4–7 are the same as in . ( B ) Computational analysis of several protein groups is performed to evaluate their distribution in different pI value ranges. It shows that the same protein level with different pI changes because of modification level. In , the proteins’ spot distribution corresponding to the different modification level is presented (column— Share, %). Representative images from one of three experiments showing similar results are shown.

    Article Snippet: The prototype is executed in MatlabTM environment (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and has integral original 2DE gel image processing algorithms as tools for specific tasks: Image preparation tools: image cropping (to remove excess areas), spot labelling, master gel selection (to align the group of gels), molecular mass markers’ calibration (to delineate area of MM marker and input of MM values), pI calibration (to input positions of known pI values); Image preprocessing related tools: image smoothing (to eliminate impulse noise), background elimination (to remove variations of background staining), individual image warping (to straighten protein migration paths); Image segmentation tools: 2DE image splitting (to split image into primary segments), segmented area evaluation (to highlight uncertain segmentations of protein spots for the user), editing of segments (to manually edit protein spots in order to remove false negatives and positives of segmentation by merging, splitting, adding, or removing areas); Image alignment tools: initial registration (to automatically detect some high confident control points for initial image registration), spot pairing and concluding image alignment (to find correspondences between spots), manual editing of alignment vectors (to remove mismatches and add new matches between images); Quantitative analysis tools: spot quantification (to measure normalized quantities of spots), changes evaluation (to calculate change ratios); Visualization tools: 3D viewer (to display small area of image as surface), image fusion (to display overlay of two images using pseudocolors).

    Techniques: Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Modification

    Identified AFP proteins—those expressions are higher in comparison to proteome associated with normal pregnancy in  2DE  gels with pI 3–11 ranges (right panel) and AFP proteins, the spots number of which (proportionate to modification) in AFP pI 4–7 differ in comparison to fractionated in pI 3–11 range (left panel).

    Journal: Biomedicines

    Article Title: Comparative Proteomic Assessment of Normal vs. Polyhydramnios Amniotic Fluid Based on Computational Analysis

    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081821

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identified AFP proteins—those expressions are higher in comparison to proteome associated with normal pregnancy in 2DE gels with pI 3–11 ranges (right panel) and AFP proteins, the spots number of which (proportionate to modification) in AFP pI 4–7 differ in comparison to fractionated in pI 3–11 range (left panel).

    Article Snippet: The prototype is executed in MatlabTM environment (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and has integral original 2DE gel image processing algorithms as tools for specific tasks: Image preparation tools: image cropping (to remove excess areas), spot labelling, master gel selection (to align the group of gels), molecular mass markers’ calibration (to delineate area of MM marker and input of MM values), pI calibration (to input positions of known pI values); Image preprocessing related tools: image smoothing (to eliminate impulse noise), background elimination (to remove variations of background staining), individual image warping (to straighten protein migration paths); Image segmentation tools: 2DE image splitting (to split image into primary segments), segmented area evaluation (to highlight uncertain segmentations of protein spots for the user), editing of segments (to manually edit protein spots in order to remove false negatives and positives of segmentation by merging, splitting, adding, or removing areas); Image alignment tools: initial registration (to automatically detect some high confident control points for initial image registration), spot pairing and concluding image alignment (to find correspondences between spots), manual editing of alignment vectors (to remove mismatches and add new matches between images); Quantitative analysis tools: spot quantification (to measure normalized quantities of spots), changes evaluation (to calculate change ratios); Visualization tools: 3D viewer (to display small area of image as surface), image fusion (to display overlay of two images using pseudocolors).

    Techniques: Comparison, Modification, Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane